Cases 1 - 10 of 48
United States of America v. Sullivan
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald E. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Hopkins v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Kuyoth, Troy et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Troy Kuyoth and Kuyoth's Body & Custom, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Rivchin
as 3:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Rivchin
Garnishee:
Fidelity Investments
Noil 2018 LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Bashar Khader, Noil 2018, LLC, a Wisconsin Domestic Limited Liability Company and Noil 2018 LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
United States of America v. Seippel
as 2:2021cv00214
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip Seippel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Washkoviak v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv01603
Respondent:
United States of America
In Re:
N9074 County Road FF
Petitioner:
Kristin K Washkoviak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Summit Contracting Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01743
Defendant:
Chad M Schampers, Nathaniel R Smith and Summit Contracting Inc
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
