Cases 21 - 30 of 293
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Oregon Wild et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WaterWatch of Oregon v. Q Bar X Ranch et al
as 1:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
WaterWatch of Oregon
Defendant:
Q Bar X Ranch, Jacqueline M. Doherty, Mary L. Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Greater Hells Canyon Council et al v. Wilkes et al
as 2:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Greater Hells Canyon Council, Oregon Wild, Central Oregon LandWatch and others
Defendant:
Homer Wilkes, Glenn Casamassa and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. Adcock et al
as 6:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild
Defendant:
Cheryl Adcock, Paul Tigan and United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Nicita et al v. City of Oregon City
as 3:2022cv00738
Petitioner:
James J Nicita, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Patricia Spady
Respondent:
City of Oregon City
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
E.R.E. Ventures, LLC, et al v. David Evans and Associates, et al
as 22-55433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E.R.E. VENTURES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, E.R.E. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and KANGARU ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA Rusack Vineyards, DBA Santa Catalina Island Vineyards
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, an Oregon corporation, HALL AND FOREMAN, INC., a merged out California corporation and LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KOLOA PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC., TERRAPACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. and CHRISTOPHERHILL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
DOW, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 22-15628
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, STATE OF UTAH and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
DOW, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 22-15529
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, STATE OF UTAH and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
