Cases 21 - 25 of 25
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 9:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument, National Trust for Historic Preservation and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2009cv03048
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, BARK, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Montana Wilderness Association v. Connell et al
as 4:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association , The Wilderness Society , Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland , Mike Pool , Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Recreational Aviation Foundation and Montana Pilots Association
Intervenor_defendant:
Missouri River Stewards , Fergus County , Phillips County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Montana Wilderness Association v. Terland et al
as 9:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association and Montana Wilderness Association
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Shasta Resources Council et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2008cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shasta Resources Council, Shasta Coalition for Preservation of Public Land and Sacramento River Preservation Trust
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, Interior Board of Land Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
