Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Defendant:
EEMSCO, Ameren Corporation, Barry Electric Cooperative and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of Missouri v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Defendant:
Evansville Electric & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Progress Energy, National Grid USA Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri and United States on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Defendant:
EEMSCO, Ameren Corporation, Barry Electric Cooperative and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of Missouri v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00374
Defendant:
Evansville Electric & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Progress Energy, National Grid USA Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Springfield City of v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 6:2011cv03383
Plaintiff:
Springfield City of
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson and Karl Brooks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Columbia, Missouri, City of et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2011cv04155
Plaintiff:
Columbia, Missouri, City of , University of Missouri Curators and Boone County, Missouri
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson and Karl Brooks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2010cv04169
Plaintiff:
Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
