Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2021cv08660
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2021cv07171
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Desert Survivors and others
Defendant:
Deputy Director Nada Wolff Culver, United States Bureau of Land Management, State Director Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
WildEarth Guardians et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Cascadia Wildlands, The Lands Council and others
Defendant:
Aurelia Skipworth, Director United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild, Humane Society of the United States, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2020cv11334
Plaintiff:
Los Padres Forestwatch and Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Secretary of Interior, Gabriel Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Center For Biological Diversity v. Armando Quintero et al
as 2:2020cv09965
Defendant:
Secretary Wade Crowfoot, Director Armando Quintero, Wade Crowfoot and others
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
USA, et al v. Montrose Chemical, et al
as 2:1990cv03122
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Simpson Paper Company, Potlatch Corporation, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Anaheim City of, Garden Grove Sanitary District, San Fernando City of and others
Defendant:
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, County Sanitation District of Los Angeles, Rhone Poulenc Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Dept of Interior, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, State of California Air Resources Board and others
Cross Defendant:
Does 1 through 40,000, being a class of persons & entities similarly situated
Plaintiff:
United States of America and California State Of
Intervenor:
Travelers Indemnity Co
Special Master:
John Francis Carroll
Amicus Curiae:
Council of American Survey Research Organizations Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
People of the State of California, The et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01911
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary Elaine Duke and others
Plaintiff:
California Coastal Commission, The and People of the State of California, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2011at00343
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Kern County Water Agency et al v. Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce et al
as 1:2009at00692
Plaintiff:
Kern County Water Agency and Coalition for a Sustainable Delta
Defendant:
Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, James W. Balsiger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
