Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Oregon Wild et al v. Warnack et al
as 6:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Supervisor David Warnack and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Wilderness Watch, et al. v. Jackson, et al.
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Watch, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Friends of the Clearwater and others
Defendant:
Forest Supervisor linda Jackson, Mary Farnsworth, U.S. Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35158
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER
Defendant / Appellant:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER
Defendant:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
IDAHO RECREATION COUNCIL, INC., PUBLIC LAND ACCESS YEAR-ROUND and IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
