Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Nagrani v. Kendall et al
as 1:2020cv08471
Defendant: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Sarah Kendall and others
Plaintiff: Ishan Nagrani
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05349
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence and others
Plaintiff: State of New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gandhi v. Kendall et al
as 1:2020cv04878
Defendant: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff: Aditya Hetal Gandhi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Prasad v. Kendall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03518
Defendant: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff: Neralagadde Subrahmanya Prasad
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York v. Wolf et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01127
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Mark A. Morgan, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff: State of New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Lewis-McCoy et al v. Mayorkas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01142
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff: R. L'Heureux Lewis-McCoy, John Harland Giammatteo, Jamil Dakwar and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08876
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff: State of New York and Eric Gonzalez
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Law Scholars, Immigrant Defense Project, Former Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff: Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae: American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party: National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae: Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lister v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Plaintiff: Jonathan M. Lister
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Rose Brophy, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?