Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RIFAI v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Dr. MUHAMAD ALY RIFAI
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEA ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RIFAI v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
MUHAMAD ALY RIFAI
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEA ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bahramirad v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2023cv02796
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Bahramirad
Defendant:
Secretary of State ANTONY BLINKEN, SECREATARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MOHN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02653
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MOHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHENG v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv03819
Plaintiff:
Ms. CUI HONG ZHENG
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LIN v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
JIA XIANG LIN
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NUNEZ RAMIREZ v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv05593
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMES R. MCHENRY, CHAIRMAN DAVID H. WETMORE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK NUNEZ RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MORLEY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY et al
as 2:2020cv04591
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, BRETT A BURROUGHS and Attorney General United States
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. MORLEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
