Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
City of Terrell Texas v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff: City of Terrell Texas
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service and Rose Hill Special Utility District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Phillips v. Texas Attorney General Public Information Office et al
as 3:2023cv01860
Plaintiff: Deloris Phillips
Defendant: Texas Attorney General Public Information Office and City Attorney Office of Garland Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff: American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ondrusek et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01874
Plaintiff: Timpy Ondrusek and Barbara Ann Ondrusek Wolfe
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jonathan S. Stover, The City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Laredo v. The United States of America, et al.
as 5:2021cv00072
Plaintiff: CITY OF LAREDO
Defendant: The UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. CUSTO, The United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bayou City Waterkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00255
Defendant: Colonel Timothy Vail, Lieutenant Todd T Semonite, Secretary Ryan McCarthy and others
Plaintiff: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
City of Red Oak, Texas et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00483
Defendant: Rockett Special Utility District, Rural Utilities Service, CoBank ACB and others
Plaintiff: City of Red Oak, Texas and Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
City of San Antonio v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2020cv00505
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Warren R. Kaufman, Chad Mizelle and others
Plaintiff: City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?