Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shibahara v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth K. Shibahara
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Holly Catalina, Laura Ramirez Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01139
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Hooper v. United States Department Of Veterans' Affairs et al
as 6:2020cv00131
Defendant:
United States Department Of Veterans' Affairs, Robert Wilkie and Michael Doe
Plaintiff:
Dennis Russell Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv01743
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Latino Network, Brenda Villarruel, Jane Doe #3 and others
Amicus Curiae:
Centro Latino Americano, Oregon Interfaith Movement for Immigrant Justice, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Backes et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 1:2019cv00482
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, John Doe and United States Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff:
Rick Barclay and George E. Backes
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Sargsyan v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv02070
Defendant:
Does, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Marianna Sargsyan
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Shiekh v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv01093
Defendant:
Doe 1-20, United States Department of Argiculture and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Aweys Mohamed Shiekh
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 2011 Food Stamp Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
