Cases 31 - 37 of 37
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, et al v. Debra Bowen, et al
as 11-17884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA BOWEN, ROSS JOHNSON, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al
as 5:2011cv05496
Defendant:
Robert Venchiarutti, William Haraf, Traci Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Think Computer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JOHN A. CLARKE, in his Official and Adminstrative Capacity as Executive Officer of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, ANDREA SHERIDAN ORDIN, erroneously sued as Andrea Sheridan Orin, in her Official Capacity as County Counsel and others
Dunn v. Harris
as 3:2011cv03343
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boston v. Harris
as 5:2011cv01873
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boston
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv01725
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, John A Clarke, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Ringgold and Justin Ringgold-Lockhart
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Debra Bowen, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Dean C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
