Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee: Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 12-15135
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. James Goldstene, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15131
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his officlal capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee: Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15241
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coalition to Defend Affirmativ, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 11-15100
Plaintiff / Appellant: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, (BAMN), DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PARTY, (DAAP) and others
Defendant / Appellee: EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and MARK YUDOF, in his official capacity as President of the University of California
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WARD CONNERLY and AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS FOUNDATION
Amicus Curiae: CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-15100
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duenas v. Schwarzenegger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05884
Plaintiff: Christopher P. Duenas
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger , Edmund G. Brown, Jr. , Kamala D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Duenas et al
as 2:2010at01881
Defendant: Christopher P. Duenas, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duenas v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010at01882
Plaintiff: Christopher P. Duenas
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Joseph Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?