Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Goldstein v. Hochul
as 23-995
Plaintiff / Appellant: Steven Goldstein, Individually and on behalf of Congregation Bnei Matisyahu and Meir Ornstein
Defendant / Appellee: Kathy Hochul, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Keechant Sewell, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department and others
USA v. King County, et al
as 23-35362
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KING COUNTY, Washington and DOW CONSTANTINE, in his official capacity as King County Executive
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae: The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Khandelwal v. King County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05314
Plaintiff: Anita Khandelwal
Defendant: Dan Satterberg, King County, Jim Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. King County Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00203
Defendant: King County, Washington and Dow Constantine
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Zaitzeff v. City of Seattle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-35955
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID ZAITZEFF
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipality and DANIEL SATTERBERG, King County Prosecutor, those in privity with him, in re RCW 9.41.250 and Sea v Evans
Khazali v. King County Court of the Washington State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01021
Plaintiff: Masoud Khazali
Defendant: King County Court of the Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
as 13-4537
Plaintiff - Appellee: David Ross, Patio.com LLC, Steve Milles and others
Defendant: Gerald Mollen, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Broome County and Eric T. Schneiderman, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant - Appellant: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County and District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4533
Plaintiff - Appellee: Expressions Hair Design, Linda Fiacco, The Brooklyn Farmacy & Soda Fountain, Inc and others
Defendant: Gerald Mollen, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Broome County
Defendant - Appellant: Eric T. Schneiderman, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County and District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America et al v. King County, Washington
as 2:2013cv02151
Plaintiff: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America , Generic Pharmaceutical Association , Biotechnology Industry Organization and others
Defendant: King County, Washington , King County Department of Public Health and Director of the King County Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?