Cases 11 - 18 of 18
G&M Variety, Inc. v. Do It Best Corporation
as 3:2014cv01973
Plaintiff:
G&M Variety, Inc.
Defendant:
Do It Best Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Ron Gadek
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Do It Best Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Do It Best Corporation
Counter_defendant:
G&M Variety, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Do It Best Corp v. Heinen Hardware LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Do It Best Corp
Defendant:
Heinen Hardware LLC , Joseph M Heinen and Rachelle S Heinen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
SLABAUGH et al v. STRUXTUR INC et al
as 1:2012cv00528
Defendant:
BEST FLOORING INC, BIG BOB'S FLOORING OUTLET OF AMERICA INC, CDC APPLIANCES INC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SLABAUGH and MATTHEW SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Best v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv00484
Plaintiff:
Judy N Best
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC v. UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. and CARBONYTE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Woods v. Best Buy Stores LP
as 2:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lunette Woods, Lunette Woods and Lunette Woods
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Woods v. Best Buy Co Inc
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Lunette Woods, Lunette Woods and Lunette Woods
Defendant:
Best Buy Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Miller v. Best Buy RV's, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Donald W Miller and Donald W Miller
Defendant:
Best Buy RV's, Inc., James Peifer, Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
