Contract Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
DEKRO v. BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE et al
as 2:2015cv02622
Plaintiff: JEFFREY D. DEKRO
Defendant: BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE , JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENKELL v. DRAUCKER et al
as 2:2013cv04272
Plaintiff: DAVID B. FENKELL
Defendant: CARL A. DRAUCKER, SQUIRE SANDERS US LLP and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
REILLY FOAM CORPORATION v. TRODAT USA, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01204
Plaintiff: REILLY FOAM CORPORATION
Defendant: TRODAT USA, LLC, M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, INC., M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IAAS Worldwide, LLC v. Monroe et al
as 1:2011cv01772
Plaintiff: IAAS Worldwide, LLC
Defendant: Dean Monroe, Monroe Enterprises, Inc., Michael Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VENTURI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEFFELFINGER et al
as 2:2010cv04471
Plaintiff: VENTURI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant: JOEL HEFFELFINGER, JOSHUA STRYJAK, SUMMIT RESTORATION, LLC F/K/A SUMMIT STAFFING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LANGE v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2009cv01686
Plaintiff: JOHN LANGE
Defendant: RONALD L. RUSSELL, RONALD L. RUSSELL AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., MICHAEL CSONKA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
THE ARDEN GROUP, INC. et al v. HOFFMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03193
Plaintiff: THE ARDEN GROUP, INC. and CRAIG SPENCER
Defendant: CAMILLE O. HOFFMAN, RESORT VENTURES, LLC, STONEHILL CAPITAL PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract None
CLEMENTE v. LOPEZ et al
as 2:2008cv05298
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A. CLEMENTE
Defendant: DONALD E. LOPEZ, PALLADIUM HOLDING COMPANY, JOHN DOE 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?