Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Yalda v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 3:2016cv02641
Plaintiff:
Alan Yalda
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
Phillips 66 Company v. Chand et al
as 3:2016cv05191
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
Pramod Chand and Pavarti Chand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips 66 Company v. California Pride, Inc., et al.
as 1:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
California Pride, Inc., Steven Coldren and Rebecca Coldren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Shipping Services Ten Inc. v. Stena Weco A/S
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
United Shipping Services Ten Inc.
Defendant:
Stena Weco A/S
Garnishee:
Atlantic Trading & Marketing, Inc. , Chevron Corporation, Gavilon Fertilizer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Phillips 66 Company v. Santa Mariah Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv00945
Defendant:
Rafeek Iskander and Santa Mariah Corp.
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Phillips 66 Company v. WBP Diesel
as 3:2015cv02161
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
WBP Diesel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips 66 Company v. New Raja Enterprises et al
as 3:2015cv04762
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
New Raja Enterprises, Daljit Singh, Balihar Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips 66 Company v. TNT Petroleum, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05938
Defendant:
Tamar Azaz, Paradise Petroleum Realty Corp., Reese@419, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips 66 Company v. Reed Avenue Foodmart, LLC, et al.
as 2:2015cv02127
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
Reed Avenue Foodmart, LLC and Vinod Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nanda v. Phillips 66 Company
as 1:2015cv02108
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company
Plaintiff:
Baljilt S. Nanda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
