Cases 11 - 17 of 17
INDIANA CHARITABLE TRUST FOR BENEFIT OF DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL et al v. TREVOR REES-JONES
as 1:2011cv01559
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CHARITABLE TRUST FOR BENEFIT OF DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, OUR LITTLE ROSES FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY, INC., JACOBS SCHOOL OF MUSIC INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
TREVOR REES-JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
GARRETT-STOTZ COMPANY v. ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
GARRETT-STOTZ COMPANY
Defendant:
MARK D. ROSE, LLC, MARK ROSE, ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION v. ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC.
as 4:2010cv00028
Defendant:
ROSE SEEDING AND SODDING, INC.
Plaintiff:
TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC. v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY et al
as 4:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC.
Defendant:
COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY and THE NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CAUDILL SEED & WAREHOUSE CO., INC. v. ROSE SEEDING & SODDING, INC. et al
as 4:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
CAUDILL SEED & WAREHOUSE CO., INC.
Defendant:
ROSE SEEDING & SODDING, INC. and MARK ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ZEMPRELLI v. TAUREL et al
as 1:2008cv00854
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZEMPRELLI and EDWARD ZEMPRELLI
Defendant:
SIDNEY TAUREL, JOHN C. LECHLEITER, SIMON N.R. HARFORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAMBRECHT et al v. TAUREL et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
N.A. LAMBRECHT, N.A. LAMBRECHT, N.A. LAMBRECHT and others
Defendant:
SIDNEY TAUREL, JOHN C. LECHLEITER, SIR WINFRIED BISCHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
