Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Stone Street Capital, LLC v. Gobbi
as 1:2012cv11204
Plaintiff:
Stone Street Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Richard J Gobbi
Counter_claimant:
Richard J Gobbi
Counter_defendant:
Stone Street Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ouch et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2011cv12090
Plaintiff:
Heang Ouch , Dieu Truong , Vith Chrorm and others
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Independent National Mortgage Corporation, OneWest Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bundy v. Golden, et al
as 3:2009cv30174
Plaintiff:
Art Bundy
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden, John A. Kelly, Barry M. Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Nance v. Golden et al
as 3:2009cv30177
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nance
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden, John A. Kelly, Barry M. Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
DiCarlo et al v. C.S.C.S., Inc et al
as 1:2009cv11370
Plaintiff:
Florindo DiCarlo and M.F.D. Realty Trust
Defendant:
C.S.C.S., Inc, C.S.C.S., Inc, Cast Stone Commercial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Stone v. Escalate, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11134
Plaintiff:
William Stone
Defendant:
Escalate, Inc. and Michael Larkin
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stone v. Ruiz
as 1:2007cv12327
Defendant:
John Ruiz
Plaintiff:
Norman Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Stone v. GERS, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10743
Plaintiff:
William Stone
Defendant:
GERS, Inc., GERS, Inc., Escalate, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Montimurro v. Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2007cv10058
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Montimurro
Defendant:
Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
