Contract Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,901
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff: S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner: Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant: Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Asherson, Klein and Darbinian et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2023cv06543
Plaintiff: Asherson, Klein and Darbinian, Neville Asherson, Anna Anahit Darbinian and others
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Isabella Casillas Guzman, Janet L. Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv03647
Plaintiff: Raj Patel
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google LLC, United States of America A Governmental Entity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff: DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
James Chou et al v. Feng Li et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02855
Defendant: Feng Li, Jianjun Qiao, Steve Li and others
Plaintiff: James Chou and CJ Max Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States of America v. RT Contractor Corp et al
as 8:2023cv00648
Plaintiff: United States of America and APS Construction Inc.
Defendant: RT Contractor Corp, Great American Insurance Company and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. RT Contractor Corp et al
as 2:2023cv02768
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of APS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant: RT CONTRACTOR CORP., a California corporation and Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
Finland Financial, Inc. v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2023cv00342
Plaintiff: Finland Financial, Inc.
Defendant: PNC Bank, National Association
Cross Claimant: PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cross Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Commodity Trucking Acquisition, LLC v. Qwest Engineering, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00569
Plaintiff: Commodity Trucking Acquisition, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Qwest Engineering, Inc., McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?