Contract Cases filed in Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Huveldt v. BMW North America LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff: Nathan Huveldt
Defendant: BMW North America, LLC, Jake Sweeney Chevrolet-Imports, Inc. (d/b/a Jake Sweeney BMW and BMW of Cincinnati North), Autonation Holdings Corp. (d/b/a BMW of Bellevue) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
American Strategic Insurance Corp v. Vuong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff: American Strategic Insurance Corp
Defendant: Quang Vuong, Ha Tu Huynh, Kimberly H. Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Jabez Holdings Inc v. GSI Pacific Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05250
Plaintiff: Jabez Holdings, Inc. JABEZ HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a ST FABRICATION, a Washington corporation doing business as ST Fabrication, United States of America and Jabez Holdings Inc a Washington corporation doing business as ST Fabrication
Defendant: GSI Pacific, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and GSI Pacific Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Rainier Insurance Company v. Sands West Inc
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff: Rainier Insurance Company
Defendant: Sands West, Inc. d/b/a Sands Showgirls and Sands West Inc doing business as Sands Showgirls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. Weilert et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05997
Plaintiff: GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
Defendant: David J Weilert and Amber D Weilert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1183 a Immigration: Action for Enforcement of a Sponsor's Affidavit of Support
City Beverages LLC v. Crown Imports LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05756
Plaintiff: City Beverages, L.L.C., d/b/a Olympic Eagle Distributing, a Missouri limited liability company with its principal place of business in Washington and City Beverages LLC a Missouri limited liability company with its principal place of business in Washington doing business as Olympic Eagle Distributing
Defendant: Crown Imports LLC, d/b/a Constellation Brands Beer Division, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois, Constellation Brands, Inc, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, Crown Imports LLC a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois doing business as Constellation Brands Beer Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv01643
Plaintiff: Amanda West
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a MetLife and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company doing business as MetLife
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lewis et al v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff: David D Lewis and Susan W Lewis
Defendant: Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Jorgensen et al v. The Dentists Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00474
Counter Defendant: Jack D Jorgensen
Plaintiff: Gary R Folkman, Gary R Folkman DDS PS, Wallace Wilkens LLC and others
Defendant: The Dentists Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?