Cases 21 - 30 of 1,090
Hicks v. TXU Energy
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
TXU Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Progressive Leasing LLC
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
Progressive Leasing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Fairfield Residential
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
Fairfield Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Toyota Financial Services
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Cortland Partners LLC
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Hicks
Defendant:
Cortland Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Williams O&G Resources, LLC v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Williams O&G Resources, LLC
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Diamondback E&P LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perez Jr. et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Raul E. Perez Jr. and Daniel A. Perez
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Dell, et al.
as 5:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jacob J. Dell, Rachel Dell and Rachel E. Dell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Fagbamila v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv04573
Plaintiff:
Abimbola E Fagbamila
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
In Re: P & E Crewboats, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
P&E Crewboats, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
