Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Camean et al v. Provident Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01467
Plaintiff:
Susan Camean and Strategic Pharma Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Provident Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Richmond Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Richmond Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Provident Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Strategic Pharma Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Reuter & Hanney, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00922
Plaintiff:
The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Defendant:
Reuter & Hanney, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nipponkoa Insurance Company, Limited (U.S. Branch) v. Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv00409
Plaintiff:
Nipponkoa Insurance Company, Limited (U.S. Branch) and Nipponkoa Insurance Company, Limited (U.S. Branch)
Defendant:
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (America), Inc., MOL (America) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Moses Lake Industries v. Qimonda Richmond, LLC
as 3:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Moses Lake Industries and Moses Lake Industries
Defendant:
Qimonda Richmond, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cox Radio, Inc. et al v. Main Line Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00741
Plaintiff:
Cox Radio, Inc., Cox Radio, Inc., The Center for Sales Strategy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Main Line Broadcasting, LLC, MLB-Richmond III, LLC, MLB-Richmond IV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Synthes Spine Company, L.P. v. Tyler Richmond
as 3:2007cv00230
Plaintiff:
Synthes Spine Company, L.P., Synthes Spine Company, L.P., Synthes Spine Company, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Tyler Richmond and Tyler Richmond
Counter Claimant:
Tyler Richmond and Tyler Richmond
Counter Defendant:
Synthes Spine Company, L.P., Synthes Spine Company, L.P., Synthes Spine Company, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
