Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Adams v. Traylor-Wolff et al
as 2:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams
Defendant:
Lisa M Traylor-Wolff and Law Offices of Kelly Leeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE KUNKEL GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00115
Plaintiff:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ADAM KUNKEL, NATHAN PERDUE, DEBRA RODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
OSTERHOLT et al v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00800
Defendant:
DRUCILLA M. ADAMS, JAMES C. ADAMS and THE TULIP COMPANY
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK J. GREEN and ROBBERT OSTERHOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ADAMS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
ALAN ADAMS and LUAN ADAMS
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
AMERICAN CONTRACTOR'S INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SES ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CONTRACTOR'S INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
SES ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DAVID STUCK, GLENN A. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOLDSTEIN et al v. MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00770
Plaintiff:
ADAM S. GOLDSTEIN, ADAM S. GOLDSTEIN, ASG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LLC and SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company v. Bane of Cincinnati Inc et al
as 1:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company and Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bane of Cincinnati Inc, David L Bane, Antonio Agustince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
