Cases 41 - 46 of 46
ACCUPRINT OF KENTUCKIANA, INC. v. CRANE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
as 4:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
ACCUPRINT OF KENTUCKIANA, INC.
Defendant:
CRANE PRODUCTIONS, INC. and CRANE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Elite Enterprises Inc et al v. Liberty Steel Products Inc
as 1:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Elite Enterprises Inc and Creative Coatings Inc
Defendant:
Liberty Steel Products Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Novogroder Companies Inc The v. Remote Productions Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Novogroder Companies Inc The
Defendant:
Remote Productions Inc, Remote Productions Inc, MTV Networks Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GREENFIELD PRODUCTS, INC. v. BATESVILLE TOOL & DIE, INC
as 1:2008cv00452
Plaintiff:
GREENFIELD PRODUCTS, INC. and GREENFIELD PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
BATESVILLE TOOL & DIE, INC and BATESVILLE TOOL & DIE, INC
Counter Claimant:
BATESVILLE TOOL & DIE, INC and BATESVILLE TOOL & DIE, INC
Counter Defendant:
GREENFIELD PRODUCTS, INC. and GREENFIELD PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
D&N Micro Products Inc v. YI Ventures LLC
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
D&N Micro Products Inc
Defendant:
YI Ventures LLC, YI Ventures LLC, YI Ventures LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
as 1:2007cv00326
Plaintiff:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH and ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
Defendant:
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION, RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. and RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Cross Claimant:
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
Cross Defendant:
RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter Claimant:
RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter Defendant:
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
