Cases 51 - 60 of 65
RAY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv06377
Plaintiff:
CLINTON RAY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MAGUIRE et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00839
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS MAGUIRE and CAROLYN MAGUIRE
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KERSHAW v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01525
Plaintiff:
LATAWNIA KERSHAW
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABRAHAM et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv05070
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ABRAHAM and MELVIN ABRAHAM
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv01231
Plaintiff:
Kay L. Knox
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johns v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Johns
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philbin v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
Margaret Philbin
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPOONER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. SPOONER
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOMAZOV et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010cv07039
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LOMAZOV and KSENIYA TSIMBERG
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv03390
Plaintiff:
WALTER SMITH
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
