Cases 51 - 60 of 448
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., AIT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
4Th Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellchaft, Hamburg
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crysknife Capital v. Liberty Specialty Markets et al
as 1:2022cv07912
Plaintiff:
Crysknife Capital
Defendant:
Liberty Specialty Markets (4472), CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Liberty Specialty Markets and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Backer EHP Inc. et al v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv06461
Plaintiff:
Backer EHP Inc. and HDI Global Insurance Company
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984 (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant:
Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Recovery Performance & Marina, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv06364
Plaintiff:
Recovery Performance & Marina, LLC doing business as Jetski Of Miami
Defendant:
MT Hawley Insurance Company and Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 Lloyd's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CARGO SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv06384
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
American International Cargo Service Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London v. Qantas Airways Limited
as 1:2022cv06221
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, PMY ETS USA, INC. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Defendant:
Qantas Airways, Ltd. and Qantas Airways Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daileader v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Syndicate 1861 et al
as 1:2022cv05408
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daileader
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Syndicate 1861, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Subscribing to Policy Number DOH00746111 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 ij Injunction
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05398
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington Inc., Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
PEAG LLC et al v. Flexport International LLC
as 1:2022cv05401
Plaintiff:
PEAG LLC and Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London
Defendant:
Flexport International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
