Cases 51 - 60 of 220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Rewis-Bruey
as 5:2013cv00540
Defendant:
Amber M. Rewis-Bruey
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Debnam
as 5:2013cv00326
Defendant:
Marie G Debnam
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Moore
as 4:2013cv00112
Defendant:
Gregory A. Moore
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Thompson
as 5:2013cv00202
Defendant:
Karen B. Thompson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Farris
as 2:2013cv00011
Defendant:
Ernestine Farris
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
XTO Energy Inc. v. Universal Pipeline, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
XTO Energy Inc.
Defendant:
Universal Pipeline, L.L.C., Prosperity Funding, Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wonson
as 4:2012cv00305
Defendant:
Orlando Wonson
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
United States of America for the use and benefit of Gaylor, Inc. of North Carolina v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc., et al
as 7:2012cv00305
Defendant:
Caddell Construction Co., Inc. , W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company , Caddell Yates Joint Venture and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Housewright, Inc., et al
as 7:2012cv00277
Defendant:
Housewright, Inc. and Digitaurus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
