Cases 81 - 90 of 226
Hadley et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv02025
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hadley and Pamela Williams
Defendant:
Alan Brent Smith and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. NELLIGAN
as 2:2017cv04441
Defendant:
JOSEPH NELLIGAN
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. WATER SERVICES, INC. v. SMITH
as 5:2017cv03706
Plaintiff:
U.S. WATER SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert D. Mabe, Inc., et al. v. OPTUMRX
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Mabe, Inc. , Abington Pharmacy, Inc. , Jac Stores, Inc. and others
Defendant:
OPTUMRX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2017cv02596
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SMITH and BOBBIE SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC.
as 2:2017cv02310
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SMITH
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE PIAZZA FAMILY TRUST II v. CIARROCCHI
as 2:2017cv01704
Defendant:
CIARROCCHI and ANTHONY CIARROCCHI
Plaintiff:
THE PIAZZA FAMILY TRUST II
Cross Defendant:
MICHAEL PIAZZA, ANTHONY PIAZZA, KEVIN W. SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HORN v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
MELISSA K. HORN
Defendant:
MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , SECURIAN FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC. , AFFINION BENEFIT GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EISAMAN CONTRACT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. SMITH SYSTEM MFG., CO.
as 2:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
EISAMAN CONTRACT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
SMITH SYSTEM MFG., CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
