Cases 1 - 8 of 8
O'BRADOVICH v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OBRADOVICH and MICHAEL O'BRADOVICH
Defendant:
CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC., OPTUM, INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SPENCER et al v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SPENCER, SCOTT CHANG, JESSICA BURGESS and others
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. CHANG CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02173
Defendant:
JESSICA JACOBS, EVAN JACOBS, CHANG CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CHANGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS I, LLC v. KISS ELECTRIC, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
CHANGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS I, LLC
Defendant:
SOLAR BY KISS, LLC, JOSEPH F. KISS, JR., KISS ELECTRIC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HONG v. HERITAGE-LEDERACH, L.P. et al
as 5:2013cv05093
Plaintiff:
CHANG B. HONG
Defendant:
HERITAGE-LEDERACH, L.P., HGB LEDERACH, INC., HERITAGE-LOWER SALFORD, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCANTOP ENTERPRISE, COMPANY, LTD. et al v. LARSON et al
as 2:2012cv05170
Plaintiff:
SCANTOP ENTERPRISE, COMPANY, LTD. , CHUAN-CHIH CHANG and CHIN-MING YANG
Defendant:
STEPHEN P. LARSON and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THORNTON v. UL ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
LANCE THORNTON
Defendant:
UL ENTERPRISES, LLC, STNA, INC., STEVE LARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC. et al v. PR PLYMOUTH MEETING, LLC
as 2:2009cv01794
Plaintiff:
P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
Defendant:
PR PLYMOUTH MEETING, LLC and PR PLYMOUTH MEETING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
