Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Still et al
as 3:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Annette M. Still, Melvin Farris, Ethel Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Seidlitz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 6:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Douglas Seidlitz
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Douglas v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
as 1:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
Sharon Douglas
Defendant:
State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Adams v. Frohnmayer et al
as 3:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Adams
Defendant:
Mark Frohnmayer, Douglas M. Campoli, Terry L. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kenyon v. Ellison-Meade
as 1:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kenyon
Defendant:
Austin Ellison-Meade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laguerre et al v. Frohnmayer et al
as 6:2021cv00982
Nominal Defendant:
Arcimoto, Inc.
Defendant:
Terry L. Becker, Jesse G. Eisler, Mark D. Frohnmayer and others
Plaintiff:
Reynold Laguerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobson v. SRS Distribution Inc.
as 3:2021cv00224
Defendant:
SRS Distribution Inc.
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC v. Taos NM Senior Living, LLC, et al.
as 3:2019cv01750
Plaintiff:
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC, as successor in interest to Renaissance Rehabilitation Services, LLC and Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC,
Defendant:
Douglas Sproul, Mosaic Management, Inc., TAOS NM SENIOR LIVING, LLC d/b/a TAOS RETIREMENT VILLAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv01425
Plaintiff:
Cindy Edwards and Douglas Edwards
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
