Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Chlorine Institute et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
Chlorine Institute and American Chemistry Council
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
American Chemistry Council, et al v. California Northern Railroad, et al
as 2:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
American Chemistry Council, Chlorine Institute, Inc. and Olin Corporation
Defendant:
California Northern Railroad and RailAmerica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
American Chemistry Council, et al v. California Northern Railroad, et al
as 2:2009at00800
Plaintiff:
American Chemistry Council, Chlorine Institute, Inc. and Olin Corporation
Defendant:
California Northern Railroad and RailAmerica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Ned Comer, et al v. Murphy Oil USA, et al
as 07-60756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NED COMER, BRENDA COMER, ERIC HAYGOOD, husband of Brenda Haygood and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MURPHY OIL USA, UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS, SHELL OIL CO and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS INC, EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE, AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION and others
:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES, AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, PUBLIC NUISANCE FAIRNESS COALITION and others
Ned Comer v. Murphy Oil USA
as 07-60756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ned Comer, Brenda Comer, Eric Haygood, husband of Brenda Haygood and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Murphy Oil USA, Universal Oil Products, Shell Oil Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, Incorporated, Edison Electric Institute, American Public Power Association and others
Not Classified By Court:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, American Chemistry Council, Public Nuisance Fairness Coalition and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
