Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ECOMAINE INC v. POWER SERVICES GROUP INC
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
ECOMAINE INC
Defendant:
POWER SERVICES GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FOOTMAN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC
as 2:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOOTMAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAR HARBOR BANK & TRUST v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP INC
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP INC and HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BAR HARBOR BANK & TRUST
Petitioner:
TRAVIS PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
PERRY v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP INC
as 1:2020cv00301
Defendant:
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP INC and HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SYMQUEST GROUP INC v. BATES MILL DERMATOLOGY PLLC
as 2:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
SYMQUEST GROUP INC
Defendant:
BATES MILL DERMATOLOGY PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. AIRE SERV LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
TROY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AIRE SERV LLC and DWYER GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIL TECHNOLOGY INC v. ENGINEERING REMEDIATION RESOURCES GROUP INC
as 2:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
HIL TECHNOLOGY INC
Defendant:
ENGINEERING REMEDIATION RESOURCES GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDDLE et al v. GECKOBYTE.COM INC
as 2:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RIDDLE and RTM MARKETING GROUP INC
Defendant:
GECKOBYTE.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP INC et al
as 2:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
DANNY R GREEN
Defendant:
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP INC and RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FLYNN v. LIBERTY et al
as 2:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FLYNN
Defendant:
MICHAEL LIBERTY , AMERICAN HOUSING PRESERVATION CORP , LIBERTY GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
