Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CARROLL et al v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
JESSICA M CARROLL and MARC F CARROLL
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CARROLL et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2017cv03173
Plaintiff:
SUSAN C. CARROLL and KEVIN P. CARROLL
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY , STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES and STATE FARM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robert D. Mabe, Inc., et al. v. OPTUMRX
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Mabe, Inc. , Abington Pharmacy, Inc. , Jac Stores, Inc. and others
Defendant:
OPTUMRX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv02702
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARROLL
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
WOOD v. GGNSC MURRYSVILLE, L.P.
as 2:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
SARAH J. CARROLL WOOD
Defendant:
GGNSC MURRYSVILLE, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll v. Keane Group Holdings
as 4:2014cv01620
Plaintiff:
Eberhard Brendan Carroll
Defendant:
Keane Group Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIPLEY et al v. BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2014cv04764
Plaintiff:
CARROLL RIPLEY, JR. and CAROLYN RIPLEY
Defendant:
BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIPLEY et al v. BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2014cv04763
Plaintiff:
CARROLL RIPLEY, JR. and CAROLYN RIPLEY
Defendant:
BRETHREN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOODRIDGE v. ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv07436
Plaintiff:
CARROLL WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
