Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Egan, Flanagan and Cohen, P.C. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv30041
Defendant:
Chase, Clarke Stewart & Fontana and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Egan, Flanagan and Cohen, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London Subcribing to Policy No. XSZ46404 v. The Maverick Street Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12059
Defendant:
Jose Maria Espana, Acorn Development LLC, Eloy Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London Subcribing to Policy No. XSZ46404
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Egan et al v. Daikin North America LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11630
Plaintiff:
Christopher Egan and Jean Egan
Defendant:
Daikin North America LLC, Daikin Applied Americas, Inc. and Daca Delaware Dissolution Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth Family Trust v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv10114
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
EMC Corporation, Jose E. Almeida, Michael W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pancake v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv10040
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pancake
Defendant:
EMC Corporation, Joseph M. Tucci, Jose E. Almeida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stull v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13692
Plaintiff:
Philip Stull
Defendant:
EMC Corporation , Dell Inc., Silver Lake Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsh v. EMC Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13654
Plaintiff:
Thomas Walsh
Defendant:
EMC Corporation , Jose E. Almeida , Michael W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrys Consulting, Inc. v. Exceptional 3D, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10093
Plaintiff:
Abrys Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
Exceptional 3D, Inc. and Michael P. Egan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Egan v. Polanowicz
as 4:2013cv40092
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Egan
Defendant:
John Polanowicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
