Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cotes v. Franklin et al
as 2:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Mathew Cotes
Defendant:
Jon Franklin, F/V Viking and F/V The Viking
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Burgher v. Franklin et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
David A Burgher and David Burgher
Defendant:
Jon Franklin, F/V Viking and F/V The Viking
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Knauer v. Franklin et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Erich Knauer
Defendant:
Jon Franklin, F/V Viking and F/V The Viking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Pemberton et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Franklin Pemberton and Teah Chadderdon
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strash v. Oregon Fisheries, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00975
Plaintiff:
Marcus Strash
Defendant:
Oregon Fisheries, Inc., Jon Franklin and F/V Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Safeco Insurance Company of America et al v. Reagor et al
as 3:2012cv05151
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America and First National Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jerry Reagor, Jane Doe Reagor and Franklin Bobadilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America and First National Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jerry Reagor, Jane Doe Reagor and Franklin Bobadilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv05183
Plaintiff:
Richard Franklin
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Deming v. First Franklin et al
as 3:2009cv05418
Plaintiff:
Roger J Deming
Defendant:
First Franklin, Merrill Lynch & CO Inc and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
