Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Garrett v. ITM TwentyFirst, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10065
Plaintiff:
Sp. Administrator Jerry Garrett
Defendant:
ITM TwentyFirst, LLC, John Does 1-5 and ABC Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Garrett v. ITM TwentyFirst, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv10065
Plaintiff:
Sp. Administrator Jerry Garrett
Defendant:
ITM TwentyFirst, LLC, John Does 1-5 and ABC Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Newton Covenant Church et al v. Great American Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv12628
Plaintiff:
Anders Brownworth, Garrett Smith, Kristen Lucken and others
Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taxi Maintenance, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10598
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp
Plaintiff:
Taxi Maintenance, Inc. , Alice's Cab, Inc. , George's Cab, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacCausland v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10253
Plaintiff:
Raymond P MacCausland
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oxford Global Resources, LLC v. Speed et al
as 1:2016cv12427
Plaintiff:
Oxford Global Resources, LLC
Defendant:
Alicia Speed and Garrett Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv30058
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY DANIELLE GARRETT
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company Of America and Prudential Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adrion v. Knight et al
as 1:2008cv12037
Plaintiff:
George J. Adrion
Defendant:
Garrett Knight, Retail Expert Inc., John Conmy and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Adrion v. Knight et al
as 1:2007cv11277
Plaintiff:
George J Adrion
Defendant:
Garrett Knight and Retail Expert Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
