Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GUR-RAVANTAB et al v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Emir Gur-Ravantab and Emily Lama
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
STUDENT A v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv01886
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
STUDENT A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv01539
Plaintiff:
daria crawford and STUDENT A
Defendant:
Georgetown University Board of Regents, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY and BOARD OF REGENTS OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
JOHN DOE v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv01370
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUDENT A v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 2:2020cv05937
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
STUDENT A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEMPREVIVO v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2019cv01400
Plaintiff:
ADAM SEMPREVIVO
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antoinette Burns v. Matthew Levy, et al
as 16-7103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoinette Burns, D.O.
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew D. Levy, M.D., Georgetown University, doing business as Georgetown University Medical Center and Medstar-Georgetown University Hospital, Inc.
GINSBURG v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2013cv01312
Plaintiff:
SCOTT K. GINSBURG
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Counter_claimant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Counter_defendant:
SCOTT K. GINSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
as 1:2013cv01012
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BURNS v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv00898
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and MATTHEW D. LEVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
