Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TotalMed Staffing, Inc. v. United HealthCare Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
TotalMed Staffing, Inc.
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc. and Optum Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Robertson et al v. Government Personnel Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv02236
Plaintiff:
Justin Robertson, Lauren Robertson and National Senior Benefits Services, LLC
Defendant:
Government Personnel Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Knutson et al
as 0:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Christina Marie Knutson, Jason Tomporowski, Dana Mayo and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bristlin v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 0:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jason Bristlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayo et al v. Knutson et al
as 0:2019cv00788
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company, Neil Owen Knutson and Christina Marie Knutson
Plaintiff:
Dana Mayo and Melissa Amandalee Mayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomporowski v. Knutson et al
as 0:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Neil Owen Knutson, Government Employees Insurance Company and Christina Marie Knutson
Plaintiff:
Jason Tomporowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godfrey v. Novaczyk et al
as 0:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
Courtney Godfrey
Defendant:
Ryan Novaczyk , State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Government Employers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Natural Process Design, Inc. v. JEH Government Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
Natural Process Design, Inc.
Defendant:
JEH Government Services, Inc. and John Hofkes
Counter_claimant:
JEH Government Services, Inc. and John Hofkes
Counter_defendant:
Natural Process Design, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
