Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Holland America Line, NV et al v. Orient Denizcilik Turizm Sancyi Ve Ticaret, AS, et al
as 2:2017cv01617
Defendant:
Does, Karen Fedorko Sefer and Orient Denizcilik Turizm Sancyi Ve Ticaret, A.S.
Plaintiff:
Holland America Line, N.V. and Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01742
Plaintiff:
HAL Antillen N.V., HAL Nederland N.V. and Holland America Line N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAL Antillen N.V. et al v. Ramsower et al
as 2:2016cv01744
Plaintiff:
HAL Antillen N.V. , HAL Nederland N.V. and Holland America Line N.V.
Defendant:
David Dayton Ramsower, Angela Irene Ramsower, Amalia Garzon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sugeng Priyanto, et al v. M/S Amsterdam, et al
as 10-55485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUGENG PRIYANTO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general and AGUS EKO SUYANTO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA ADENI, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general and INDRA SUKMANA PUTRA KUSUMA
Defendant - Appellee:
M/S AMSTERDAM, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N.V., Erroneously Sued As Holland America Line Inc. and HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC
Sarifudin, et al v. M/S Westerdam et al
as 2:2010cv00422
Defendant:
Westerdam M/S, Ryndam M/S, Zaandam M/S and others
Plaintiff:
Sarifudin , Ridwan Gopar and Kadek Kris Sumewibawa
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951 Marine Contract Actions
De La Pena v Holland America Line N.V.
as 1:2010cv20530
Plaintiff:
Nathanial De La Pena
Defendant:
Holland America Line N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sugeng Priyanto v. M/S Amsterdam et al
as 2:2007cv03811
Plaintiff:
Sugeng Priyanto
Defendant:
M/S Amsterdam and Holland America Line N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
