Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WARD v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00460
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
PENNY J. WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLD v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00061
Defendant:
AFFINION BENEFITS GROUP, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and HARTFORD UNSPONSORED GROUP INSURANCE TRUST
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WEST v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00432
Defendant:
CSC GROUP INSURANCE PLANS and HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. WEST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
GENIEC v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GENIEC
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BERG v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv01452
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BERG
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Sexton et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Davina Renee Sexton, Rhonda Sue Sexton, Maynard Depew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
LORETTA CAROL COOPER
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HEY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01114
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RUBY HEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
