Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hinds County Human Resource Agency v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00383
Defendant:
Canon Financial Services, Inc., Canon Solutions America, Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hinds County Human Resource Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. City of Byram, Mississippi, Board of Aldermen et al
as 3:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Byram, Mississippi, Board of Aldermen , Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Jeffery M. Savell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Acadia Insurance Company v. Hinds County School District
as 13-60481
Defendant-Cross Claimant - Appellant:
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cross Defendant - Appellee:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Acadia Insurance Company v. Hinds County School District
as 13-60286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Hinds County School District v. Ace American Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Hinds County School District
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Coward et al v. Hinds County School District et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Bryant Coward and Johnna Coward
Defendant:
Hinds County School District , Illinois Union Insurance Company and ACE USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acadia Insurance Company v. Hinds County School District et al
as 3:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Acadia Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hinds County School District and Bryant and Johnna Coward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hinds County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors v. Motorola, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Hinds County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors, Hinds County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors and Hinds County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors
Defendant:
Motorola, Inc., John Wilson, John Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
