Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mawule Tepe v. Javitch Block LLC, et al
as 23-6088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVITCH BLOCK LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 23-6090
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, LLP, Law Firm and FRANKIE NEIL SPERO, Attorney
Mawule Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 23-6098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Mawule Tepe v. Travis R. McDonough, et al
as 23-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, in his U.S. District Chief Judge position, JANE DOE, I, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position, JANE DOE, II, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position and others
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JAVITCH BLOCK LLC
Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation, Clifton L Corker, Jane Doe3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tepe v. Nenni
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Emily Louise Nenni and Javitch Block LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Frankie Neil Spero and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, et al
as 22-5882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA and JAVITCH BLOCK LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
