Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodgers v. Hope College
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Joseph O. Rodgers, Elise Carter and Emily Damaska
Defendant:
Hope College
Petitioner:
Jennie Devries
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2022cv10298
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shirlleslea Rodgers, Toinu Rodgers, Destiny Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Stolsonburg v. Rodgers
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Carol Stolsonburg
Defendant:
Brett N. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stolsonburg v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Carol Stolsonburg
Defendant:
Brett N. Rodgers, Brett N. Rodgers Trustee Account, Scott W. Dales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rodgers v. Trumbull Insurance Company et al
as 2:2017cv10170
Plaintiff:
Patrick E. Rodgers
Defendant:
Trumbull Insurance Company, Fiserv Inc, The Fiserv Inc Medical Plan, a Component of the Fiserv Inc Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Siovation, LLC et al v. Rodgers
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
Siovation, LLC and ICM Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Jim Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Rodgers v. Motor City Casino
as 2:2008cv10870
Plaintiff:
Terrence F Rodgers
Defendant:
Motor City Casino
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Visteon Corporation v. Frank Rodgers Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv15422
Plaintiff:
Visteon Corporation
Defendant:
Frank Rodgers Corporation and Rodgers Molding Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Rodgers Molding Corporation
Cross Defendant:
Frank Rodgers Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
