Cases 1 - 6 of 6
S&J Logistics, Inc. et al v. United National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
S&J Logistics, Inc. and Sukhvir Singh
Defendant:
United National Insurance Company, Continental Trucking Association, Trinity Underwriters, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S&J Logistics, Inc. et al v. United National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022at00051
Plaintiff:
S&J Logistics, Inc. and Sukhvir Singh
Defendant:
United National Insurance Company, Continental Trucking Association, Trinity Underwriters, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S and J Supply Company, Inc. v. Air West Mechanical Construction Inc et al
as 2:2019cv09936
Plaintiff:
S&J Supply Company, Inc., a California corporation and S and J Supply Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Andy Anderson, Air West Mechanical Construction Inc, THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA, a Michigan corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Michael Jace et al
as 5:2015cv02265
Defendant:
Savoy Brown, C S J, N A J and others
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
LIG Insurance Company Limited v. Exel Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv04382
ThirdParty Defendant:
Atom Express Inc, C&E Trucking Inc, FNS Inc and others
Defendant:
Does, Exel Transportation Services Inc and Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Exel Transportation Services Inc
Cross Claimant:
Exel Transportation Services Inc
Plaintiff:
LIG Insurance Company Limited
Cross Defendant:
Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd.
United States of America for the use and benefit of Action Sheet Metal Inc et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 8:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Action Sheet Metal Inc and United States of America
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company, S J Amoroso Construction Company Inc and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
