Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PADGETT v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 1:2017cv03749
Plaintiff:
LORI PADGETT
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
RENNER v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 1:2016cv01542
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP, METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
MARIA ALICIA RENNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
RENNER v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 1:2015cv02028
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
MARIA ALICIA RENNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thoma-Dickinson v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Laura Thoma-Dickinson
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CADWELL v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 1:2014cv01157
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CADWELL
Defendant:
STEEL DYNAMICS, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BEAR v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 4:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
ADA M. BEAR
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ENGEBRETSON v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 4:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON and KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VAN GAASBEEK, M.D. v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 4:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
GARY L. VAN GAASBEEK, M.D.
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
