Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peppers et al v. Mascher et al
as 3:2021cv08090
Defendant:
Unknown Hearl, Wexford Medical Services, Yavapai County Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tinsley and Gordon Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doemel v. Arizona Board of Regents
as 2:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents
Plaintiff:
Brock Doemel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Arizona Board of Regents
as 2:2020cv01126
Plaintiff:
Chloe Diaz
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenkrantz et al v. Arizona Board of Regents
as 2:2020cv00613
Plaintiff:
Susan Bishop, Christopher Bishop, Andrew Rosenkrantz and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HKB Incorporated v. Board of Trustees for the Southwest Carpenter's Southwest Trust et al
as 2:2016cv03799
Plaintiff:
HKB Incorporated
Defendant:
Board of Trustees for the Southwest Carpenter's Southwest Trust and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Liou v. Maricopa County Community College District, Board of
as 2:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
Glenn Liou
Defendant:
Maricopa County Community College District, Board of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Desert Best Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant:
Desert Best Enterprises LLC , CTW LLC , Frank R Ruiz and others
Counter_claimant:
Jacqueline S Ruiz
Counter_defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board , William Liddle and Rhonda Liddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Arizona Board of Regents et al v. Seattle Genetics Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv02498
Plaintiff:
Arizona Board of Regents and Arizona Science and Technology Enterprises LLC
Defendant:
Seattle Genetics Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
