Cases 91 - 100 of 103
Quiksilver, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01791
Plaintiff:
Quiksilver, Inc. and Quiksilver, Inc.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O, Inc. v. Manley Toys, Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv01281
Plaintiff:
Wham-O, Inc., Wham-O, Inc., Wham-O, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Manley Toys, Ltd., Izzy Holdings, LLC, Aquawood, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Lake-Thompson v. Bay Island, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2007cv02645
Plaintiff:
Mary Lake-Thompson, Ltd.,
Defendant:
Bay Island, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Xtreme Metal Fab, Inc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01105
Plaintiff:
Xtreme Metal Fab, Inc and Xtreme Metal Fab, Inc
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Bell Automotive Products, Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
True Religion Apparel Inc v. Wal-Mart Stories Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02580
Plaintiff:
True Religion Apparel Inc and True Religion Apparel Inc
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stories Inc, Sam's East Inc, Sam's West Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Eye Ojo Corporation v. Cold River Unlimited Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00409
Plaintiff:
Eye Ojo Corporation and Eye Ojo Corporation
Defendant:
Cold River Unlimited Inc, Cold River Unlimited Inc, Cold River Unlimited Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Cold River Unlimited Inc and Camo Vision of Georgeia LLC
Counter Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Eye Ojo Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Discover Financial Services Inc
as 2:2007cv02250
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Movant:
Target National Bank, Target Bank and Target Corporation
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. CitiBank N A
as 2:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
CitiBank N A, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Counter Claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation
as 2:2007ml01816
Defendant:
Carolina Power & Light Company, Citizens Communications, Time Warner Cable Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc., Xerox Global Services Inc and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Intervoice Inc and Aspect Communications Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Macy's Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc, FDS Bank and others
Counter Claimant:
21st Century Casualty Company, Randall's Food Markets Inc, DIRECTV Holding, LLC and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn and Bernard H Chao
Petitioner:
Target Corporation, Target Bank, Robert Cohn and others
Cross Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei Optoelectornics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv01667
Plaintiff:
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd., Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd., Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Chi Mei Optoelectornics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Funai Electric Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
