Cases 101 - 110 of 23,935
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Geneva Laboratories Limited et al v. Oh et al
as 2:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
Geneva Laboratories Limited and Union-Swiss (Proprietary) Limited
Defendant:
Sabrina Oh, Beautyfublic Corp. and Cosmethings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fletcher et al v. Niang et al
as 1:2024cv01913
Plaintiff:
Bryan Fletcher and Garrett Fletcher
Defendant:
Abdoulaye Niang, Alexander Niang, Mewza LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Neu Productions Inc. et al v. Eureka Entertainment LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Neu Productions Inc., Roderick Robert John, Patrick Parnell and others
Defendant:
Eureka Entertainment LLC and Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shook v. Townsquare Media, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01764
Plaintiff:
Derek Shook
Defendant:
Townsquare Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
