Cases 111 - 120 of 121
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02305
Plaintiff:
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Komipharm International Co., LTD. v. Kappos
as 1:2009cv01332
Plaintiff:
Komipharm International Co., LTD.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TOLERX, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02255
Plaintiff:
TOLERX, INC., ISIS INNOVATION, LTD. and CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FRANCE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02256
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON FRANCE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01969
Plaintiff:
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CHUGAI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
CHUGAI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
UNILEVER PATENT HOLDINGS B.V. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01673
Plaintiff:
UNILEVER PATENT HOLDINGS B.V.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
LIFENET HEALTH v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01645
Plaintiff:
LIFENET HEALTH
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v. Kappos et al
as 1:2009cv00935
Plaintiff:
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
