Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A. et al v. Sensus Healthcare, LLC
as 0:2015cv02538
Plaintiff:
Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A. and Charles E. Crutchfield, III
Defendant:
Sensus Healthcare, LLC
Anderson v. Choices Psychotherapy, Ltd. et al
as 0:2015cv02433
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Anderson
Defendant:
Choices Psychotherapy, Ltd. and Susan Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Allan Block Corporation v. E. Dillon & Company
as 0:2015cv02060
Plaintiff:
Allan Block Corporation
Defendant:
E. Dillon & Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Wright v. Fish-Hard.com et al
as 0:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Jon Q. Wright
Defendant:
Fish-Hard.com, Amy L. Penza, David P Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McElroy v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04112
Plaintiff:
Ray E. McElroy
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Schobel v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04097
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Schobel
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Roberson v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04072
Plaintiff:
James E. Roberson
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Robbins v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04070
Plaintiff:
James E. Robbins
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Peterson v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04005
Plaintiff:
Calvin E. Peterson
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Prior v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04017
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Prior
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
